LAB REPORT ON CIDER







DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY
FACULTY OF SCIENCE & MATHEMATICS
SULTAN IDRIS EDUCATION UNIVERSITY
FOOD SCIENCE
SBK 3033
LABORATORY REPORT (CIDER)

NAME
MATRIC NUMBER

SHAFIQAH BINTI HANAFI
D20141067057
NOR ASHLIA BINTI SAIDI
D20141067059
NAZIYAHTUL BINTI ANIFAH
D20141067075

LECTURER’S NAME : PROFESSOR DR HASIMAH ALIMON
GROUP                         : GROUP A





 LABORATORY REPORT (CIDER)

1.Preparation of cider for taste

INGREDIENTS
·         Honeydew
·         Sugar
·         Water

PROCEDURE

  1.     . The entire utensil cleaned with water before use it.
  2.       Watered the honeydew then cut it into cube size.
  3.       Water was poured into a container is 500ml and honeydew is 183g..
  4.       The container filled with 100g of sugar.
  5.       Repeat steps 3-4 with 200g and 300g of sugar.
  6.      The container kept in the refrigerator for weeks.
  7.       After weeks, the container was kept in the room temperature and the taste event for the cider take placed.

VARIABLES FOR CIDER

Manipulated variable : The weight of sugar
Responding variable : Number of criteria based on taste of cider from the respondent
Constant variable       : volume of water


RESULT FOR CIDER TASTE


Score indicator


1 : poor
2 : ok 
3 : intermediate
4: good
5 : excellent


 OBSERVATION

Waste with different amount of water


Result for 10 person

Sample

Criteria

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Appearan-ce


5

5

1

4

3

4

5

3

3

3

5

5

3

5

4

2

2

2

5

4

4

1

3

5

4

1

3

3

5

5

Colour


5

5

1

5

5

5

5

4

4

3

5

5

4

5

4

4

4

3

3

1

4

2

2

1

1

2

3

4

5

5

Taste


2

3

2

5

5

4

4

4

2

3

5

3

4

4

3

5

2

4

1

1

1

4

3

1

2

1

2

3

5

5

Smell


5

4

1

3

3

4

5

4

4

2

5

4

4

4

4

1

5

5

1

3

2

1

1

5

4

2

1

1

5

4


Average result for 10 person

Sample

Criteria

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Appearance


3.3

3.5

3.9

Colour


3.6

3.1

4.2

Taste


3.0

2.8

3.5

Smell


3.1

3.2

3.4




DISCUSSION

The experiment that have been conducted in the laboratory are the development of cider by using different material of each group. For this experiment, our group are asked to make cider from honey dew. The cider are juiced pressed from fruits that used for drinking either before fermentation (sweet cider) or after fermentation (hard cider) and making vinegar. The process to produce cider juice are about 2 weeks. In addition, we have make the water and the mass of fruit as a control whereas the sugar act as variable. We have put different amount of sugar in three different container which are Container A with 300 g sugar, container B with 200 sugar, and container C with 100 g sugar.

Based on the experiment, we have obtain that container C are good cider but both container A and container B have been alcoholic. This is because the container C have sweet taste whereas the other container have sour taste. Both container A and container B have undergo fermentation. Fermentation are metabolic process that converts sugar to ethyl alcohol or acid under anaerobic condition. The fermentation takes place when the carbon dioxide are released but prevent the air from environment from coming in the container. This is because the exposure to oxygen will prevent the formation of ethanol and the buildup of carbon dioxide will create a risk the container will rupture.

For this experiment, we have receive 10 respondent to give the feedback about the appearance, color, taste, smell, and flavor of our cider. From the feedback of 10 respondent, we have receive balance feedback even though two of three of our cider have been alcohol due to fermentation process. This is due to different people have different tastes.In general, the appearance of cider A are more concentrated than cider B and C due to the higher of sugar content in the cider. Then, the color of cider A are cloudier than the cider B and cider C. After that, the taste and smell of cider A and B are sour whereas the taste of cider C have sweet taste. Then, the flavor of cider A and B have gone due to fermentation process whereas the cider C still have honeydew flavor.

Based on the respondent feedback, we obtain that the number of respondent that give excellent value for appearance of cider are 3 people for sample A, 2 people for sample B and 5 people for sample C. Then, the number of respondent that give excellent value for colourof cider are 4 people for sample A, 2 people for sample B and 5 people for sample C. Then, the number of respondent that give excellent value for taste of cider are 3 people for sample A, have no people for sample B and 3 people for sample C. Then, the number of respondent that give excellent value for smell of cider are 3 people for sample A, 2 people for sample B and 2 people for sample C.

Based on the respondent feedback, we obtain that the average number of respondent that give feedback value for appearance of cider are 3.3 for sample A, 3.5 people for sample B and 3.9 people for sample C. Then, the number of respondent that give feedback value for colour of cider are 3.6 for sample A, 3.1 for sample B and 4.2 for sample C. Then, the number of respondent that give feedback value for taste of cider are 3.0 for sample A, 2.8 for sample B and 3.5 people for sample C. Then, the number of feedback that give value for smell of cider are 3.1 for sample A, 3.2 for sample B and 3.4 for sample C.

Based on the Cobweb plot,we can see that the shape of sample C are bigger and located at the most outer compare both sample A and sample B. Both sample A and sample B have more or less same location in the Cobweb plot. This is because the both sample that undergo fermentation process have same taste and appearance.

There are some precaution during making the honeydew cider. The amount of the sugar need to be reduce to ensure the process of fermentation are reduce and prevent the cider from be alcohol. In addition, the water used should be boil and the fruits must be wash to ensure the preparation of cider are clean and safety to be tested. Then, the mass of the fruit and volume of water must be weighed by using weighing scale and measuring cylinder because both substance acts as control.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the cider C have good tester whereas both cider A and cider B have undergo fermentation process. This causes the cider C have sweet taste whereas cider A and cider B have sour taste and more concentrated. For the Cobweb plot, the shape of sample C are bigger and located at the most outer compare both sample A and sample B



.

LABORATORY REPORT (ALCOHOL)

 Preparation of alcohol (Waste)
INGREDIENTS
  •         Honeydew
  •        Sugar
  •         Water
  •        Yeast


PROCEDURE

  1.       The entire utensil cleaned with water before use it.
  2.       The honeydew washed with water first.
  3.       Honeydew substance used to make cider.
  4.       The container filled with 140g honeydew substance and 100ml of water.
  5.       The yeast pinched the same amount for every container.
  6.       Repeat steps 2-3 for 200ml and 300ml of water.
  7.       The container kept in the refrigerator for weeks.


VARIABLES FOR WASTE

Manipulated variable : The volume of water
Responding variable  : Volume of alcohol produce
Constant variable       : The weight of sugar



RESULTS
Volume of water  (ml)
Volume alcohol present (ml)
100
2.9
200
2.1
300
1.9


2.  Preparation of alcohol (Cider)

INGREDIENTS

·         Honeydew
·         Sugar
·         Water

PROCEDURE
  1. Honeydew rind peeled.
  2. Honeydew seeds and skins are used to make wine.
  3. Honeydew substance used to make cider.
  4. Water poured into a container is 500ml and honeydew is 183g.
  5. The container filled with 100g of sugar.
  6. Repeat steps 6-7 with 200g and 300g of sugar.
  7.  The container closed with a white cloth.
  8.  The container kept in the refrigerator for weeks.

VARIABLES FOR CIDER

Manipulated variable : The weight of sugar
Responding variable  : Volume of alcohol produce
Constant variable       : The volume of water

OBSERVATION

Cider with different amount of sugar



RESULT
Weight of sugar (g)
Volume alcohol present (ml)
100
0.15
200
0.30
300
0.10


DISCUSSION

Firstly, alcohol produced by the honeydew substance. Based on the table above, we can assume that the alcohol produced by honeydew substance is less than honeydew waste.  This is because the volume of water used to produce alcohol is 500ml that more than used to produce cider. Container A produces 0.1ml, the lowest volume of alcohol, while container C produces 0.3ml, the largest volume of alcohol, this is according to the weight of sugar added to the container and leave for a weeks. When the volume of sugars is larger, the water will dissolved all sugar in the container. Then, the volume of water will be decrease and produce less alcohol after the process of distillation. We used 100ml of all type of cider and alcohol for distillation process. At the point, digital thermometer showed 79 degree Celsius, we switch off the plug and the droplets of alcohols will flow to the beaker.

Next, alcohol produced by waste of honeydew. Alcohol produced by it is more than honeydew substances after the distillation process. Container A produced 2.9ml of alcohol when used 100ml of water, while container C produced 1.9ml of alcohol when used 300ml. Then, we assume that, the higher the volume of water the smaller volume of alcohol will produced. The white cloth that cover the container is functioned to allow the oxygen enters the container to make the reaction of the alcohol occurs. The small amount of yeast used because it will speed up the reaction in the containers. If we used lots of yeast, the content of the container will overflow because the volume of container is small and volume of water is large.

CONCLUSION

The amount of alcohol produced by honeydew waste is larger than produced by the honeydew substance.

REFERENCES

Singh, H. HHP and Manjrekar, SP (1975) Studies on preparation of cider from North Indian      apples ll storage studies. Indian food Packer, 30(1), 12-15.
Flora, L. F., & Beuchat, L. R. (1976). Preparation of cider from muscadine grapes.
De Silva, R. L., & Saravanapavan, T. V. (1968). Tea cider. a potential winner



No comments:

Post a Comment